nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ipv6 help
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:13:45 +0200
On 24/Aug/20 17:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
You probably mean 464XLAT .... Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even better. If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new boxes ... just something to think in the future about those vendors. I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been doing this for many customers. Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features.
If CLAT support were wide-spread, it would quickly accelerate the deployment of IPv6 in broadband applications. Not even Mikrotik are doing it, and they pretty much own the FTTH CPE market in many countries. If only CPE's could run Android, or Windows :-). Mark.
Current thread:
- Ipv6 help Brian (Aug 22)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 22)
- Re: Ipv6 help Roman Tatarnikov (Aug 24)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 24)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Tom Hill (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help Roman Tatarnikov (Aug 24)
- Re: Ipv6 help Ca By (Aug 22)
- Re: Ipv6 help Brandon Martin (Aug 25)
- Re: Ipv6 help JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Aug 25)