nanog mailing list archives

RE: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?


From: <adamv0025 () netconsultings com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:38:06 +0100

Wondering whether the industry will consider containerised data-plane in addition to control-plane (like cRDP). 

Having just control-plane and then hacking to kernel for doing the data-plane bit is …well not as straight forward as 
having a dedicated data-plane VM or potentially container. 

 

adam

 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+adamv0025=netconsultings.com () nanog org> On Behalf Of Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2020 7:09 PM
To: Robert Raszuk <robert () raszuk net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Has virtualization become obsolete in 5G?

 

Clearly to virtualize operating systems as long as your level of virtualization mainly in terms of security and 
resource consumption isolation & reservation is satisfactory is a much better and lighter option.  

 

That pretty much sums up Intel's view.

 

To quote an Intel executive I was corresponding with:

 

"The purpose of the paper was to showcase how Communication Service Providers can move to a more nimble and future 
proof microservices based network architecture with cloud native functions, via container deployment methodologies 
versus virtual machines.  The paper cites many benefits of moving to a microservices architecture beyond whether it is 
done in a VM environment or cloud native. We believe the 5G networks of the future will benefit greatly by implementing 
such an approach to deploying new services."

 

The paper referred to is this one 
<https://www.intel.in/content/www/in/en/communications/why-containers-and-cloud-native-functions-paper.html%20> .

 

Cheers,

 

Etienne

 

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 6:23 PM Robert Raszuk <robert () raszuk net <mailto:robert () raszuk net> > wrote:

I reason that Intel's implication is that virtualization is becoming obsolete.

Would anyone care to let me know his thoughts on this prediction?

 

Virtualization is not becoming obsolete ... quite reverse in fact in all types of deployments I can see around. 

 

The point is that VM provides hardware virtualization while kubernetes with containers virtualize OS apps and services 
are running on in isolation. 

 

Clearly to virtualize operating systems as long as your level of virtualization mainly in terms of security and 
resource consumption isolation & reservation is satisfactory is a much better and lighter option. 

 

Thx,

R.

 




 

-- 

Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
University of Malta

Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale


Current thread: