nanog mailing list archives
Re: CGNAT Solutions
From: Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:44:14 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Robert Blayzor wrote:
So as a happy medium of about 2048 ports per subscriber, that's roughly a 32:1 NAT/IP over-subscription ?
Yes, around that. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: CGNAT Solutions, (continued)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Ca By (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Masataka Ohta (Apr 30)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Robert Blayzor (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Tarko Tikan (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions james jones (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Robert Blayzor (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Mikael Abrahamsson via NANOG (Apr 29)
- RE: CGNAT Solutions Aaron Gould (Apr 29)
- Re: CGNAT Solutions Jared Geiger (Apr 28)