Re: CGNAT Solutions

[Jared Geiger <compuwizz () gmail com>]

Take a look at DANOS for CG-NAT as a free solution or Netgate's TNSR has a
CG-NAT feature https://www.tnsr.com/features

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:57 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <
nanog () nanog org> wrote:

> I will say it is much better to consider 464XLAT with NAT64, if the CPEs
> allow it.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8683/
>
>
>
> I’m right now doing a deployment for 25.000.000 customers of an ISP (GPON,
> DLS and cellular mix), all the testing has been done, and all doing fine.
>
>
>
> I’ve done it already for smaller ISPs, but the size of this project is
> more interesting to better demonstrate that it just works.
>
>
>
> I plan to do a presentation when the information can be made public … bit
> delay because the Covid-19 confinement.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El 28/4/20 21:15, "NANOG en nombre de John Alcock" <
> nanog-bounces () nanog org en nombre de john () alcock org> escribió:
>
>
>
> Afternoon,
>
>
>
> I run a small ISP in Tennessee.  COVID has forced a lot of people to work
> from home.  I am starting to run low on IP's and need to consider CGNAT.
>
>
>
> I do have IPV6 space, but we all know that until we force everyone to move
> to IPV6, we need to keep IPV4 up and running.
>
>
>
> I could buy more space, but I am really wondering if that is the
> best option.  It is expensive. I know CGNAT devices are expensive as well,
> but it looks like I could stretch it out a bit.
>
>
>
> My thinking is to convert about 50% of my subscribers to CGNAT.
>
>
>
> I am interested in vendors or devices you have used in the past.  I
> already know about the pitfalls many of my subscribers will have with CGNAT
> such as VPN's, Gamers, etc.
>
>
>
> What are your thoughts on CGNAT vendors?
>
>
>
> A10Networks
>
> F5Networks
>
> Others?
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.