nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse Desks


From: Matt Corallo via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:40:12 -0400

Please don't use this kind of crap to send automated "we received 3 login attempts on our SSH box..waaaaaaaaa" emails.
This is why folks don't have abuse contacts that are responsive to real issues anymore.

Matt

On 4/28/20 11:57 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I noticed over the weekend that a Fail2Ban instance's complain function wasn't working. I fixed it. I've noticed a few
things:

1) Abusix likes to return RIR abuse contact information. The vast majority are LACNIC, but it also has kicked back a
couple for APNIC and ARIN. When I look up the compromised IP address in Abusix via the CLI, the APNIC and ARIN ones
return both ISP contact information and RIR information. When I look them up on the RIR's whois, it just shows the ISP
abuse information. Weird, but so rare it's probably just an anomaly. However, almost everything I see in LACNIC's 
region
is returned with only the LACNIC abuse information when the ones I've checked on LACNIC's whois list valid abuse
information for that prefix. Can anyone confirm they've seen similar behavior out of Abusix? I reached out to them, 
but
haven't heard back.
2) Digital Ocean hits my radar far more than any other entity.
3) Azure shows up a lot less than GCP or AWS, which are about similar to each other.
4) Around 5% respond saying it's been addressed (or why it's not in the event of security researchers) within a couple
hours. The rest I don't know. I've had a mix of small and large entities in that response.
5) HostGator seems to have an autoresponder (due to a 1 minute response) that just indicates that you sent nothing
actionable, despite the report including the relevant log file entries.
6) Charter seems to have someone actually looking at it as it took them 16 - 17 hours to respond, but they say they
don't have enough information to act on, requesting relevant log file entries...  which were provided in the initial
report and are even included in their response. They request relevant log file entries with the date, time, timezone,
etc. all in the body in plain text, which was delivered.
7) The LACNIC region has about 1/3 of my reports.



Do these mirror others' observations with security issues and how abuse desks respond?



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com


Current thread: