nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail admins?
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:43:23 -0600
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 08:05:39AM +0300, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020, 12:45 AM Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:sad. http://nanog.org used to be the brilliant example of a fully featured web site sans javascript, flash, ...That was long ago now. It was using Cvent for everything meeting-related for 3 years already, and Cvent doesn't feel good with JS turned off.
Yes -- I think we all understand the technical problems with the site. Thanks for helping Randy with being precise.
Current thread:
- mail admins? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Neil Hanlon (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Töma Gavrichenkov (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? John Osmon (Apr 22)
- Re: mail admins? Bryan Holloway (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Neil Hanlon (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Jan Schaumann (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Bryan Fields (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? William Herrin (Apr 21)
- Re: mail admins? Mark Andrews (Apr 29)
- Re: mail admins? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? William Herrin (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Bryan Fields (Apr 23)
- Re: mail admins? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 26)