nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:01:54 -0300
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:37 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko < nuclearcat () nuclearcat com> wrote:
There is simple use case that will prove this page is giving false positive for their "name&shame" strategy. Any AS owner with default route only (yes it happens a lot) users will get: "YOUR ISP TERRIBLE, HIS BGP NOT SAFE!". But he have nothing to validate! His BGP is implemented safely, its just his upstream is not validating routes.
So, that same ISP who is not validating because it has a default route could push its providers to do validation and then be as safe as other validating themselves ? Rubens
Current thread:
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test, (continued)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Randy Bush (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Cummings, Chris (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Tom Beecher (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Rubens Kuhl (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Cummings, Chris (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Andrey Kostin (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Mark Tinka (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Alex Band (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Christopher Morrow (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test jim deleskie (Apr 20)
- Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test Denys Fedoryshchenko (Apr 20)