Re: Cogent sales reps who actually respond

["Stephen M." <stephen.myspam () gmail com>]

Please don’t praise or complain like we’re supposed to take it at a total face value. If you don’t like them so much - 
we are you’re audience. Explain. 

If you like Cogent - explain.
If you don’t like Cogent - explain.

Cheers,
Stephen

//please pardon any brevities - sent from mobile//

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com> wrote:
>
> Whenever asked about Cogent, i just say, “Friends don’t let friends use Cogent.”
>
> I’ve told two of their reps over the past two years that even if the service was free, i wouldn’t use it. And yet, 
> they still call.
>
> -Mike
>
> > > On Sep 16, 2019, at 13:53, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg () tristatelogic com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <E814E5F6-F386-4AAE-BADA-E423D299A4FB () delong com>, 
> > > Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Given their practice of harvesting whois updates in order to spam newly
> > > acquired AS contacts, any time it is my decision, Cogent is ineligible
> > > as a vendor.
> >
> > So I guess then that their aiding and abetting of fraud and IP block
> > theft, as I documented here recently, is an entirely secondary concern...
> > as long as they don't spam you, yes?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > rfg