nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mx204 alternative
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn () mork no>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 10:29:19 +0200
Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> writes:
The MX80 and MX104 have no business being in any modern conversation these days :-).
Except for the other MX-80, of course, which are better than ever. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MX-80 Bjørn
Current thread:
- Re: Mx204 alternative, (continued)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Gavin Henry (Sep 02)
- RE: Mx204 alternative Phil Lavin (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative tim () pelican org (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Butterworth (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Kenneth McRae via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Kenneth McRae via NANOG (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Bjørn Mork (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Baldur Norddahl (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Denys Fedoryshchenko (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Saku Ytti (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Mark Tinka (Sep 02)
- Re: Mx204 alternative Brandon Martin (Sep 02)