nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:04:02 -0700
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 12:01 PM <bzs () theworld com> wrote:
My main point is, as I said, Bits is Bits, whether they're human readable (for some value of "human") like URLs or long hex strings which perhaps are less human readable.
Bits aren't just bits. Bits with useful properties (such as aggregability which coincides with the routing structure) are better bits. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 08)
- RE: IPv6 Pain Experiment Michel Py (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Joel Halpern (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 07)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment William Herrin (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Nicholas Warren (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Valdis Klētnieks (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Masataka Ohta (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 08)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment bzs (Oct 09)
- Re: IPv6 Pain Experiment Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Re: worse than IPv6 Pain Experiment John Levine (Oct 09)