nanog mailing list archives

Re: This DNS over HTTP thing


From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 00:52:59 +0000 (UTC)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=nanog () bakker net>

* jra () baylink com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 23:21 CEST]:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=nanog () bakker net>

* jra () baylink com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 19:30 CEST]:
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () comcast com>
What many people dismiss as 'lying' would be typically described as 'complying
with the law' in certain countries. It is unfortunate that operators in
countries with legally-mandated DNS blocks are criticized for the actions they
have no option but to undertake. IMO any such criticisms should more correctly
be directed at the laws themselves or the governments that put them in place.

HTTP/451

Completely different protocol than what the rest of this thread is
about, much more invasive wrt possibility of logging, and requires
a lot more infrastructure and actual lying in DNS to make work.

Closed captioned for the analogy-impaired:

"The idea you're talking about, Jason, is analogous to that embodied in
the 451 error code in HTTP."

Oh, you weren't proposing a technical solution to a social problem?

*I* wasn't proposing any solutions to any problems, at that particular
twist, Neils, as I thought was obvious.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: