nanog mailing list archives

Re: This DNS over HTTP thing


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 10:44:47 +0200

* jra () baylink com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 23:21 CEST]:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niels Bakker" <niels=nanog () bakker net>
To: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 1:42:08 PM
Subject: Re: This DNS over HTTP thing

* jra () baylink com (Jay R. Ashworth) [Wed 02 Oct 2019, 19:30 CEST]:
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () comcast com>
What many people dismiss as 'lying' would be typically described as 'complying
with the law' in certain countries. It is unfortunate that operators in
countries with legally-mandated DNS blocks are criticized for the actions they
have no option but to undertake. IMO any such criticisms should more correctly
be directed at the laws themselves or the governments that put them in place.

HTTP/451

Completely different protocol than what the rest of this thread is
about, much more invasive wrt possibility of logging, and requires
a lot more infrastructure and actual lying in DNS to make work.

Closed captioned for the analogy-impaired:

"The idea you're talking about, Jason, is analogous to that embodied in
the 451 error code in HTTP."

Oh, you weren't proposing a technical solution to a social problem?


        -- Niels.


Current thread: