nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:21:22 +1100



On 6 Mar 2019, at 1:36 pm, Fernando Gont <fgont () si6networks com> wrote:

On 5/3/19 03:26, Mark Andrews wrote:


On 5 Mar 2019, at 5:18 pm, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 5/Mar/19 00:25, Mark Andrews wrote:


Then Cloudflare should negotiate MSS’s that don’t generate PTB’s if
they have installed broken ECMP devices.  The simplest way to do that
is to set the interface MTUs to 1280 on all the servers.  Why should
the rest of the world have to put up with their inability to purchase
devices that work with RFC compliant data streams.

I've had this issue with cdnjs.cloudflare.com for the longest time at my
house. But as some of you may recall, my little unwanted TCP MSS hack
for IPv6 last weekend fixed that issue for me.

Not ideal, and I so wish IPv6 would work as designed, but…

It does work as designed except when crap middleware is added.  ECMP
should be using the flow label with IPv6.  It has the advantage that
it works for non-0-offset fragments as well as 0-offset fragments and
also works for transports other than TCP and UDP.  This isn’t a protocol
failure.  It is shitty implementations.

Not to play devil's advocate but the IETF fot to publish a spec for ECMP
use of Flow Labels only a few years ago.

For quite a while, they were unasable... and might still be, for some
implementations.

And if it is still using the quintuple the PTB has all the necessary information
for unfragmented and 0 offset fragment packets (which there shouldn’t be with a
working TCP stack) to be passed through.

-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont () si6networks com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: