nanog mailing list archives
Re: well-known Anycast prefixes
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 23:55:03 +0300
Hi, On 19/03/2019 23:13, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Generally, static lists like that are difficult to maintain when they’re tracking multiple routes from multiple parties.
agreed. and on the other extreme, communities are very much prone to abuse. I guess I could set any community on a number of prefixes (incl anycast) right now.... So, I think a (moderated) BGP feed of prefixes a'la bogon from a trusted {cymru[1], pch[2], ...} could be good [3]. Frank Habicht 37084 / 33791 if that matters {1] dealing with anycast? [2] biased? [3] speaking as someone not using (subscribing) any of the useful ones, nor contributing to any...
Current thread:
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes, (continued)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Fredy Kuenzler (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Siyuan Miao (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Damian Menscher via NANOG (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Joe Provo (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Fredy Kuenzler (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 19)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes James Shank (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Frank Habicht (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Job Snijders (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bryan Holloway (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Ross Tajvar (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bryan Holloway (Mar 21)
- Re: well-known Anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (Mar 21)