nanog mailing list archives

Re: well-known Anycast prefixes


From: Siyuan Miao <aveline () misaka io>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 01:56:08 +0800

A Well-known BGP community will be better.

You'll need to rewrite next hop or do something similar if AnyCast prefixes
are learnt from a multi hop BGP feed, and it made the configuration more
complicated and difficult to debug.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 01:48 Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler () init7 net> wrote:

Am 19.03.19 um 18:39 schrieb Bill Woodcock:
On Mar 19, 2019, at 10:12 AM, Fredy Kuenzler <kuenzler () init7 net>
wrote: I wonder whether anyone has ever compiled a list of
well-known Anycast prefixes.

I don’t know of one.

It seems like a good idea.

BGP-multi-hop might be a reasonable way to collect them.

If others agree that it’s a good idea, and it’s not stepping on
anyone’s toes, PCH would be happy to host/coordinate.

Thanks for the effort, much appreciated.

Am 19.03.19 um 18:40 schrieb Joe Provo:
I think one would want that internal and no rely upon someone else
maintaining it.  You might check if Oracle followed up on the
Renesys/Dyn work documented:
https://dyn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/NANOG59_Anycast.pdf

...where there were ~600 anycast v4 prefixes at the time.

That's a lot %-]

Maybe a well-known community (similar to RFC7999) could be defined and
every Anycast operator could tag his prefixes? That's likely a better
idea than manually maintain some list somewhere.

--
Fredy Kuenzler

Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd.
AS13030
Technoparkstrasse 5
CH-8406 Winterthur
Skype:   flyingpotato
Phone:   +41 44 315 4400
Fax:     +41 44 315 4401
Twitter: @init7 / @kuenzler
http://www.init7.net/



Current thread: