nanog mailing list archives
Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP
From: Prasun Dey <prasun () nevada unr edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:30:33 -0400
Hi William, Ha ha! Thanks for pointing that out. I’m not related to any ISP at all, so this is something new. I understand, PeeringDB is just a basic guideline and ISPs put their own information about their traffic ratios. I’m interested to know whether ISPs check their own accumulated traffic and then set their own outbound:inbound traffic ratios threshold to declare themselves as Heavy Outbound/ Inbound or Balanced. Or, is there some kind of rough understanding among networking community to treat certain ratios as Heavy/ Mostly Inbound/ Outbound. Thank you. - Prasun Regards, Prasun Kanti Dey Ph.D. Candidate, Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Central Florida web: https://prasunkantidey.github.io/portfolio/
On Jun 19, 2019, at 2:14 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:50 AM Prasun Dey <prasun () nevada unr edu <mailto:prasun () nevada unr edu>> wrote:I’m a Ph.D. candidate from University of Central Florida. I have a query, I hope you can help me with it or at least point me to the right direction. I’ve seen from PeeringDB that every ISP reveals its traffic ratio as Heavy/ Mostly Inbound or Balanced or Heavy/ Mostly Outbound. I’m wondering if there is any specific ratio numbers for them. In Norton’s Internet Peering Playbook or some other literary work, they mention the outbound:inbound traffic ratio as 1:1.2 to up to 1:3 for Balanced. But, I couldn’t find the other values.Hi Prasun, Ratio only masquerades as a technical term. It's whatever it takes to convince the other guy to set up settlement-free peering and you'll tweak your routing adjusting reality to match. The information in peeringdb is just a rough guide to help you figure out who to talk to as you try to adjust your traffic profile so that you can go after the big fish as "balanced." Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us <mailto:bill () herrin us> https://bill.herrin.us/ <https://bill.herrin.us/>
Current thread:
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP, (continued)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Aaron Gould (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Aaron Gould (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Keith Medcalf (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Valdis Klētnieks (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Ross Tajvar (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- RE: Traffic ratio of an ISP Aaron Gould (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP i3D.net - Martijn Schmidt via NANOG (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Josh Luthman (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Mike Hammett (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Prasun Dey (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Seth Mattinen (Jun 21)
- Re: Traffic ratio of an ISP Mark Tinka (Jun 21)