Re: Postmaster@

[Matt Corallo <nanog () as397444 net>]

I presume you were contacting them due to their (apparently) bogus SPF
parsing? Seems they recently broke something and email servers I've been
sending from for 10 years without much configuration change recently
started getting generic SPF-looking failure messages (I guess they don't
properly parse "+MX -ALL"?).

Given the automated form linked at that page also returns garbage about
how my IPs look fine and aren't blacklisted and there is no reason why
mail shouldn't deliver (why bother having a box to put the error
message?), can someone over there contact off-list?

Matt

On 6/15/19 1:44 AM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo All!
>
> Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?
>
> Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed?  Or is M$ more special than the
> rest of us?
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
>       gem () rellim com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588
>
>           Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
>     "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 +0000
> From: The Outlook.com Team <postmaster () outlook com>
> To: <gem () rellim com>
> Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541
>
>
> This email address is not monitored. Please visit
> http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to
> Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an
> Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn
> more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your
> feedback.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Outlook.com Team
> Microsoft
> One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
>
>
>
> Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online
> Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com