nanog mailing list archives

Re: Postmaster@


From: bzs () theworld com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 15:38:31 -0400


I wonder how much do-not-reply@ and similar is spammed?

On June 15, 2019 at 01:47 mel () beckman org (Mel Beckman) wrote:
Postmaster@ is so widely spammed as to be useless. Standards, and even laws, can be overcome by reality. Witness the 
DoNotCall list.

 -mel beckman

On Jun 14, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Gary E. Miller <gem () rellim com> wrote:

Yo All!

Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?

Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed?  Or is M$ more special than the
rest of us?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
   gem () rellim com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

       Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
   "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin


Begin forwarded message:

Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 01:38:16 +0000
From: The Outlook.com Team <postmaster () outlook com>
To: <gem () rellim com>
Subject: Fw: gem : rellim541


This email address is not monitored. Please visit
http://postmaster.outlook.com for information about sending email to
Outlook.com, including troubleshooting information. If you are an
Outlook.com user please visit http://answers.microsoft.com/ to learn
more about our services, find answers to your questions, and share your
feedback.

Sincerely,

Outlook.com Team
Microsoft
One Microsoft Way. Redmond, WA 98052, USA.



Microsoft respects your privacy. To learn more, please read our online
Privacy Statement at http://privacy.microsoft.com

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs () TheWorld com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*


Current thread: