nanog mailing list archives
Re: 44/8
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:24:30 -0700
On 7/22/19 10:16 AM, William Herrin wrote:
Respectfully John, this wasn't a DBA or an individual figuring the org name field on the old email template couldn't be blank. A class-A was allocated to a _purpose_. You've not only allowed but encouraged that valuable resource to be reassigned to an organization, this ARDC, and then treated the organization as a proxy for the purpose. No one asked you to do that. Nothing in the publicly vetted policies demanded that you attach organizations to the purpose-based allocations and certainly nothing demanded that you grant such organizations identical control over the resources as the control possessed by folks who were the intended direct recipients of assignments.
From the outside it kind of looks like someone created an org that didn't exist before but matched the name in whois and said "oh yeah that's ours, says so right there".
Current thread:
- Re: 44/8, (continued)
- Re: 44/8 Bryan Fields (Jul 21)
- Re: 44/8 John Curran (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Seth Mattinen (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 andrew.brant via NANOG (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Fred Baker (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Paul Timmins (Jul 22)
- Re: 44/8 Brandon Butterworth (Jul 22)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Matt Hoppes (Jul 23)
- RE: 44/8 Naslund, Steve (Jul 23)
- Re: 44/8 Nathan Brookfield (Jul 23)