Re: SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]

[Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>]

On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:

> Because I saw support from people like Alessandro Vesely for my proposal. 
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/pSb216OGLuTe31yUzAXtqD2haAo
>
> Then it hit me. Maybe more people like him interested in SMTPS too. So I have done some research and posted this 
> comment. 
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/apZ8nBnGpv1aXlFUtbcTjGipA8Q 
>
> When I open this thread, I just wanted to make sure we are all on the same page. I think I even mentioned what IETF thinks 
> when I created this thread. And asked "I would
> love to know where you stand on this proposal." 

This is a mailing list for network operations.  When SMTP on another 
alternate port is something we have to configure our routers for (i.e. an 
ACL update), then it might have some small relevance here.  Until then, 
talk about it is just noise.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
                             |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________