nanog mailing list archives

Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling


From: Lee <ler762 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:19:08 -0400

On 10/10/18, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design () gmail com> wrote:
To be fair, the idea that your security costs shouldn't outweigh
potential harm really shouldn't be controversial.  You don't spend a
billion dollars to protect a million dollars worth of product.

The problem with that idea is that it's almost always implemented as
  your security costs shouldn't outweigh _your_ potential harm

Regards,
Lee

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:54 AM Naslund, Steve <SNaslund () medline com>
wrote:

Mr Herrin, you are asking us to believe one or all of the following :

1.  You believe that it is good security policy to NOT have a default DENY
ALL policy in place on firewalls for DoD and Intelligence systems handling
sensitive data.

2.  You managed to convince DoD personnel of that fact and actually got
them to approve an Authorization to Operate such a system based on cost
savings.

3.  You are just trolling to start a discussion.

The reason I asked what system it is would be to question the authorities
at DoD on who and why this was approved.  If you don't want to disclose
that then you are either trolling or don't want anyone to look into it.
It won't be hard to determine if you actually had any government contracts
since that is public data.  There are very few systems whose EXISTENCE is
actually classified, but you were the one that cited it as an example
supporting your policy.  If you cannot name the system then it doesn't
support your argument very well does it.  Completely unverifiable.

In any case I believe the smart people here on NANOG can accept or reject
your security advice based on the factors above.  I'm done talking about
this one.

Steven Naslund


Want to tell us what system this is?

Yes, I want to give you explicit information about a government system
in this public forum and you should encourage me to do so. I thought
you said you had some skill in the security field?

Regards,
Bill Herrin


Current thread: