nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news


From: "K. Scott Helms" <kscotthelms () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 13:05:54 -0400

Anne,

Yep, if you're doing a decent job around securing data then you don't have
much to be worried about on that side of things.  The problem for most
companies is that GDPR isn't really a security law, it's a privacy law (and
set of regulations).  That's where it's hard because there are a limited
number of ways you can, from the EU's standpoint, lawfully process
someone's PII.  Things like opting out and blanket agreements to use all of
someone's data for any reason a company may want are specifically
prohibited.  Even companies that don't intentionally sell into the EU (or
the UK) can find themselves dealing with this if they have customers with
employees in the EU.

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. <amitchell () isipp com
wrote:



On May 23, 2018, at 10:21 AM, Daniel Brisson <dbrisson () uvm edu> wrote:

Also, don't forget the private right of action.  Anyone can file
anything in the U.S. courts... you  may get it dismissed (although then
again you may not) but either way, it's going to be time and money out of
your pocket fighting it.  MUCH better to just get compliant than to end up
a test case.

Isn't "better" a factor of how much it costs to become compliant with
GPDR?  I'm no expert, but some of the things I've heard sounded not trivial
to implement (read potentially BIG investment).

-dan

In our experience, orgs that are already following all industry best
practices are, generally, at least 70% of the way to becoming compliant
already.   Where it can get expensive for the ones who aren't is in
hardening their systems to provide for better security/privacy.  U.S.
companies are used to being able to drink at the firehose of data that is
collected here in the U.S., and use it however they want.. this is the real
major change.  I suppose you could say it's expensive in that it is
reducing the ways they can monetize that data.

Anne

Anne P. Mitchell,
Attorney at Law
CEO/President,
SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance
GDPR Compliance Consultant
GDPR Compliance Certification
http://www.SuretyMail.com/
http://www.SuretyMail.eu/

Attorney at Law / Legislative Consultant
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)
Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook
Legal Counsel: The CyberGreen Institute
Legal Counsel: The Earth Law Center
Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee
Member, Colorado Cybersecurity Consortium
Member, Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Member, Advisory Board, Cause for Awareness
Member, Elevations Credit Union Member Council
Former Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose

Available for consultations by special arrangement.
amitchell () isipp com | @AnnePMitchell
Facebook/AnnePMitchell  | LinkedIn/in/annemitchell




Current thread: