nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:17:41 +0200
On 22/May/18 16:14, Saku Ytti wrote:
Yes. In ISIS you'd use Prefix-SID sTLV and attach it to TLV-236 (IPv6) or TLV-237 (Multitopo IPv6). The standard itself has not had any IPv4 bias, IPv6 has had first class support since first draft.
Have you seen an actual deployment in the field, forwarding IPv6 traffic inside MPLS? My use-case would be to remove BGPv6 in the core, the same way I removed BGPv4 from the core back in 2008. I know LDPv6 can do this, but support across multiple platforms is not where it needs to be yet, making network-wide deployment impractical. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Segment Routing, (continued)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing steve ulrich (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)