nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:01:11 +0200
On 22/May/18 15:38, Saku Ytti wrote:
Why 'alas'? In ISIS you're free to signal Prefix-SID on IPv4 or IPv6, there isn't anything inherently IPv4 in the standard.
Can I use that to create MPLS LSP's to carry IPv6 traffic over an IPv6 next-hop, like LDPv6 has been designed to, i.e., not need for IPv4 in any way to forward MPLS frames carrying an IPv6 payload? Don't remember that being the case the last time I checked, but things could have moved on since then. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Segment Routing, (continued)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing steve ulrich (May 22)