nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: James R Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 10:46:15 -0400
On Mar 29, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Chip Marshall <chip () 2bithacker net <mailto:chip () 2bithacker net>> wrote: ... I think the real question is "when are we going to get some memorable IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?" 2001:4860:4860::8888 or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as 8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9. -- Chip Marshall <chip () 2bithacker net <mailto:chip () 2bithacker net>> http://2bithacker.net/ <http://2bithacker.net/>
Perhaps the real question is why is this important. The great mass of users simply does not even know what DNS is. And, supposedly, we wise NANOG people know how to cut and paste. - 75.75.75.75 James R. Cutler James.cutler () consultant com <mailto:James.cutler () consultant com> PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu <http://pgp.mit.edu/>
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mark Milhollan (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? nop (Mar 31)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mehmet Akcin (Mar 31)