nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:24:41 +0200
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 07:01:59AM -0700, Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org> wrote a message of 20 lines which said:
I believe that centralized DNS resolvers such as 8.8.8.8 are of benefit to those folks who can't run their own recursive resolver because of OS, hardware,
Hardware is not a real problem. A Raspberry Pi is more than enough to run a resolver for a typical home.
or skill limitations,
That's certainly a more important issue. Even when someone has skills, he or she may not have the time and inclination to do system administration at home. The solution is proper packaging of this DNS function in ready-made boxes such as the Turris Omnia <https://omnia.turris.cz/>
and yet do not trust the ones provided by their ISPs.
Unfortunately, the users are often right here :-(
Current thread:
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS?, (continued)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Ken Chase (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? valdis . kletnieks (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jay Nugent (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Ken Chase (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Christopher Morrow (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mike Hammett (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Izaac (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Jared Mauch (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Seth Mattinen (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Mark Milhollan (Mar 30)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Bill Woodcock (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? James R Cutler (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Igor Krneta (Mar 29)
- Re: Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Filip Hruska (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Eric Tykwinski (Mar 29)
- Re: Yet another Quadruple DNS? Niels Bakker (Mar 29)