Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity providers

[Heather Schiller via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sidr/about/

Being presented at nanog nowish:

Architecting Robust BGP Routing Policies
Lightning Talk: BGP Transport Security - Do You Care?
Lightning Talk: Legal Barriers to Securing the Routing Architecture

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

> Authoritative list of shame with supporting evidence? (Yes, I assume there
> isn't one and that one would have to be created.)
>
> Many network operators aren't going to know who's supposed to be on that
> list and who isn't.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Job Snijders" <job () instituut net>
> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net>
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:30:05 PM
> Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many
> connectivity providers
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 12:28, Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Any solution to that? Yell at the IRRs more?
>
>
>
>
> Or more generally, everyone involved should consider to stop selling
> services to well-known BGP hijackers.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Job