nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity providers


From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:52:57 +0000

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:57:14PM +0200, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 20:23, Job Snijders wrote:
I'm very happy FranceIX apply filters - however Bitcanal is known to
submit fabricated/falsified IRR information to databases like RADB
and RIPE. I've reported this multiple times over the years to IRR
database operators.

In conclusion in the case of Bitcanal, most of your filtering is
useless (and so is mine). Participants like Bitcanal dillute the
value of your route servers and the IXP as a whole.

I can confirm that this mornig (~09h30 CEST, when I read the first
message in the thread) there were no BitCanal announces received from
FranceIX Paris RS.

What about now? Still squeaky clean? What about now? What about
tomorrow? You only need to announce hijacked routes for the duration of
the spamming campaign (usually just a few hours). The presence of this
type of actor poses a risk to all connnected to the IX fabric.

Kind regards,

Job


Current thread: