nanog mailing list archives
Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL
From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:30:47 -0700
On Thu 2018-Jun-14 23:28:50 +0200, nanog () jack fr eu org <nanog () jack fr eu org> wrote:
Bof I currently use cumulus's software, I will then report my experience: not production ready You have a lot of features, with a fast development, but .. I expect my network to be a rock solid part of my infrastructure, especially when I am using the classic part, not the fancy ones When I have huge stability issue with something like bgp, what can I say but "get away from those software, it is not production-ready yet" ?
I'd be curious about specifics. We've got some Cumulus with BGP and it hasn't given us any issues. Granted, it's very vanilla with a couple of SVIs per switch and just basic IPv4 unicast and it's just a management network, but it hasn't caused us any issues that I'm aware of.
-- Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Marcus Leske (Jun 14)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL nanog (Jun 14)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Hugo Slabbert (Jun 14)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL John Fraizer (Jun 15)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL nanog (Jun 15)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Henri Grönroos (Jun 15)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Pete Lumbis (Jun 15)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL nanog (Jun 14)
- Re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Luke Gorrie (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: fd.io vs cumulus vs snabb vs OVS vs OpenNSL Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via NANOG (Jun 15)