nanog mailing list archives
RE: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960)
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:32:26 -0500
Thanks for your replies... In the last week or so I've been testing further... Using the following items to slow/alleviate the otherwise randomness of ip's and port's been generated via my cgnat boundary nodes... APP - Address pooling paired EIM - Endpoint independent mapping EIF - Endpoint independent filtering (session-limit and outbound refresh are recommended) AMS Load balancing hash-key src-ip on my inside domain interface These combinations of options seems to cause a few nicer things to occur to help gaming and peer-to-peer and banking websites to work as they should. Let me know if you have seen similar issues and successes or failures with your cgnat deployment. -Aaron
Current thread:
- issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Aaron Gould (Jul 19)
- Re: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Matt Erculiani (Jul 19)
- Re: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jul 22)
- Re: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Ross Tajvar (Jul 23)
- Re: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Ca By (Jul 22)
- RE: issues through CGNat (juniper ms-mpc-128g in mx960) Aaron Gould (Jul 31)