Re: Proving Gig Speed

[Brant Ian Stevens <branto () argentiumsolutions com>]

"There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home."

"640K ought to be enough for anybody."


On 7/17/18 10:41 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

> 10G to the home will be pointless as more and more people move away from Ethernet to WiFi where the noise floor for 
> most installs prevents anyone from reaching 802.11n speeds, much less whatever alphabet soup comes later.
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
> To: "K. Scott Helms" <kscott.helms () gmail com>
> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog () nanog org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 7:11:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Proving Gig Speed
>
>
>
> On 17/Jul/18 14:07, K. Scott Helms wrote:
>
> > That's absolutely true, but I don't see any real alternatives in some
> > cases. I've actually built automated testing into some of the CPE
> > we've deployed and that works pretty well for some models but other
> > devices don't seem to be able to fill a ~500 mbps link.
> So what are you going to do when 10Gbps FTTH into the home becomes the norm?
>
> Perhaps laptops and servers of the time won't even see this as a
> rounding error :-\...
>
> Mark.