nanog mailing list archives
Re: Proving Gig Speed
From: Eddie Parra <eparra () zscaler com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:27:02 -0700
+1 to Jared. I’ve seen people not account for this when sizing CoS as well on Juniper. -Eddie
On Jul 16, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:02:28PM -0500, Dan White wrote: We've found that running windows in safe mode produces better results with Ookla. And MACs usually do better as well. We've gotten >900mb/s with those two approaches.I've seen engineers even forget to account for differing behaviors of vendors, eg: Juniper doesn't display the layer-2 header counters This means a 920Mb/s link may actually be 100% once you add back in ethernet framing. Remind folks that they are seeing the TCP/UDP throughput and there is ethernet + IP headers involved. - Jared
Current thread:
- Re: Proving Gig Speed, (continued)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Matt Hoppes (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 18)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 22)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Eddie Parra (Jul 17)
- RE: Proving Gig Speed Tyler Applebaum (Jul 16)
- RE: Proving Gig Speed Chris Gross (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Carlos Alcantar (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed James R Cutler (Jul 16)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed K. Scott Helms (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: Proving Gig Speed Mike Hammett (Jul 17)