nanog mailing list archives
Re: Linux BNG
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:35:14 +0200
On 14/Jul/18 20:29, tony () wicks co nz wrote:
My biggest issue with the vendor offerings is that they are not making their virtual offerings (VMX, VSR) attractive enough pricing wise at the small scale, we have successful virtual Juniper and Nokia BNG's in production but pricing wise it generally ends up with the service provider thinking that hardware was probably a better choice in the long run.
vBNG's are fraught with imperceptible license fees. But yes, if you had do deploy a BNG on an x86 box, a vBNG from a well-known vendor will likely be less problematic to setup and scale than a BNG based on Linux. Then again, I last researched this in 2016, so things could have changed a tad. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Linux BNG, (continued)
- Re: Linux BNG Raymond Burkholder (Jul 14)
- Re: Linux BNG Grant Taylor via NANOG (Jul 14)
- Re: Linux BNG Baldur Norddahl (Jul 14)
- Re: Linux BNG Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Raymond Burkholder (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Baldur Norddahl (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Baldur Norddahl (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Raymond Burkholder (Jul 15)
- Re: Linux BNG Raymond Burkholder (Jul 14)
- Re: Linux BNG Mark Tinka (Jul 16)
- Re: Linux BNG Denys Fedoryshchenko (Jul 15)