nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blockchain and Networking
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:20:28 -0500
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:28:19 -0500, William Herrin said:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Dale W. Carder <dwcarder () es net> wrote:Traceroute or any other path diagnostics comes to mind.
That's not obvious to me. Assuming the time-exceeded message was modified to include the necessary data, how would blockchain authenticate the responding router?
And do you really want to do *all* that on every single 'TTL Exceeded' ICMP? Sounds like a *really* easy way to DDoS a router....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Blockchain and Networking, (continued)
- RE: Blockchain and Networking Naslund, Steve (Jan 09)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG (Jan 09)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Michael Crapse (Jan 09)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Filip Hruska (Jan 10)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Saku Ytti (Jan 10)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Brian Kantor (Jan 09)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Jörg Kost (Jan 09)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Miles Fidelman (Jan 11)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking valdis . kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Christopher Morrow (Jan 12)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Fredrik Korsbäck (Jan 17)
- Re: Blockchain and Networking Alex White-Robinson (Jan 22)