nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 1918 network range choices
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:28:12 -0700
On Oct 5, 2017, at 5:14 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca> wrote:On Oct 5, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Steve Feldman <feldman () twincreeks net> wrote: I have a vague recollection of parts of 192.168.0.0/16 being used as default addresses on early Sun systems. If that's actually true, it might explain that choice.192.9.200.X rings a bell; but those might have been the example addresses they used in the SunOS 3.X documentation.
I recall 192.9.200.X being used both in documentation and in default system configurations. Owen (Former) Sun Employee #10056
Current thread:
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices, (continued)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jerry Cloe (Oct 05)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jay Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices valdis . kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Brian Kantor (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Joe Provo (Oct 05)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jay Ashworth (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices William Herrin (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Steve Feldman (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Lyndon Nerenberg (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Alain Hebert (Oct 06)
- Re: RFC 1918 network range choices Owen DeLong (Oct 06)
- RE: RFC 1918 network range choices Jerry Cloe (Oct 05)