nanog mailing list archives

Re: RFC 1918 network range choices


From: Joe Klein <jsklein () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:51:31 -0400

Which part?  The allocation of the addresses or the security model (section
2, 4 & 5)?

Note: Very few system, network, or security professionals have even read
anything besides section 3, the private address allocation.  Could be why
we have some many compromises --- just saying.

Joe Klein

"inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1)
PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8

On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

The answer seems to be "no, Jon's not answering his email anymore".

jon was not a big supporter of rfc1918



Current thread: