Re: F Y I

[João Butzke <lista-gter () tbonet net br>]

it worked here in Brazil against whatsapp.

Em 19/10/2017 13:49, Lee Howard escreveu:
>   
>
>
> On 10/17/17, 5:33 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Christopher Morrow"
> <nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > you know, the Sci-Hub folk could fix this themselves... with some
> > authentication requirements... and probably by just unplugging from the
> > intertubes?
> "Sci-Hub’s founder, has previously told The Scientist the site plans to
> ignore the lawsuit.” How would Sci-Hub consider this a “fix”?
>
> What enforcement mechanism would the Court have against Sci-Hub?
>
> The idea of making third parties (ISPs) incur costs (updating ACLs or
> poisoning DNS) to enforce the order is pretty bad, and doesn’t stop Tor
> access. Sorry I didn’t have a chance to file an amicus before the ruling
> tomorrow.
>
>
>
> Lee
>
>
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA)
> > <mathews () hawaii edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Judge Recommends Ruling to Block Internet Access to Sci-Hub
> > > The American Chemical Society seeks a broad order that includes millions
> > > of dollars in damages and demands action from Internet service providers
> > > and search engines.
> > > By Diana Kwon | October 4, 2017
> > >
> > > http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50563/
> > > title/Judge-Recommends-Ruling-to-Block-Internet-Access-to-Sci-Hub/
> > > http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50361/
> > > title/Publishers--Legal-Action-Advances-Against-Sci-Hub/