nanog mailing list archives

Re: replacing compromised biometric authenticators


From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:10:36 -0400

Since I'm not squeamish about such things, I do have tin snips and will
happily assist in revocation of compromised biometric authentication
factors.

Andrew

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> wrote:

(forking the thread here..)

Biometrics are still the new hotness out in North America. Cologix whom I
deal
with in Canada has a dozen and a half odd POPs in canada/usa and I think
has
fingerprinting at all sites.

If the current best operating practice is to avoid biometrics, why are they
still in use out here? Has anyone gotten the message? Is anyone in North
America
ripping them out yet?

Other factors include your country's privacy regulations for storing
irreplaceable personal information, the burden of which might not be worth
the security 'benefit'.

/kc


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:46:02PM -0400, William Herrin said:
  >On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 4:32 PM, J??rg Kost <jk () ip-clear de> wrote:
  >
  >> Do you guys still at least have biometric access control devices at
your
  >> Level3 dc? They even removed this things at our site, because there
is no
  >> budget for a successor for the failing unit. And to be consistent,
they
  >> event want to remove all biometric access devices at least across
Germany.
  >>
  >
  >Hi  J??rg,
  >
  >IMO, biometric was a gimmick in the first place and a bad idea when
  >carefully considered. All authenticators can be compromised. Hence, all
  >authenticators must be replaceable following a compromise. If one of
your
  >DCs' palm vein databases is lost, what's your plan for replacing that
hand?
  >
  >Regards,
  >Bill Herrin
  >
  >
  >--
  >William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
  >Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

--
Ken Chase - math () sizone org Guelph Canada



Current thread: