nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog () radu-adrian feurdean net>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 14:16:16 +0200
Hi, We didn't test any of those features. My understandig was that they all require extra licenses that would bring them "out of scope" ($$$-wise).... and our need was for pure "P-routers"... actually being technically unable to perform as PE was kind of hidden requirement :) On Sat, May 27, 2017, at 21:14, Aaron Gould wrote:
Hi Radu-Adrian, have you done any MPLS PE functions on the NCS5001 ? ...like MPLS/VPLS L2VPN, or L3VPN ? I'm asking because I tried a NCS5001 in my lab about a year or 2 ago and it was pretty bad. At which point I was told to only try it as a P box from a Cisco engineer....at which point it dropped from my consideration since I needed to replace lots of Cisco ME3600's with mpls edge functions, and I ended up settling on the Juniper ACX5048. I'm wondering if Cisco improved that NCS5001 in more recent versions of XR to included functional MPLS L2 and L3 vpn's. -Aaron
Current thread:
- Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Erik Sundberg (May 18)
- RE: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router michalis.bersimis (May 18)
- Re: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Saku Ytti (May 18)
- RE: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router John van Oppen (May 25)
- Re: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 27)
- SV: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Gustav Ulander (May 27)
- RE: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Ben Cornish (May 28)
- RE: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Aaron Gould (May 27)
- Re: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Radu-Adrian Feurdean (May 28)
- SV: Cisco NCS5501 as a P Router Gustav Ulander (May 27)