nanog mailing list archives
Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic
From: Steven Tardy <sjt5atra () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 19:18:33 -0400
On May 23, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Pedro de Botelho Marcos <pbmarcos () inf ufrgs br> wrote: consider acquiring extra "bandwidth as a service" that is available on demand just when one needs it,
Wasn't this the initial promise of SDN? Hand wave. Magically connected endpoints. All QoS'd and bandwidth-guaranteed configuration completed perfectly every time across disparate networks/equipment.
Current thread:
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic, (continued)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Christopher Morrow (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Keith Medcalf (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Randy Bush (May 23)
- RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic Aaron Gould (May 24)
- Re: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic LHC (k9m) (May 23)