nanog mailing list archives
Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent
From: Jeff Waddell <jeff+nanog () waddellsolutions com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:12:40 -0500
Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes they don't have On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig () swordarmor fr> wrote:
On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote:Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them...Why did you don’t ask for a full view? With that, you can easily deal with that kind of problem. -- alarig
Current thread:
- google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Marty Strong via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Alarig Le Lay (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Howard Leadmon (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Job Snijders (Mar 03)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)