nanog mailing list archives
RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:20:31 +0100
Shouldn't that be 2000::/3 ? Den 2. mar. 2017 17.06 skrev "Aaron Gould" <aaron1 () gvtc com>: Correction... ::/0 is what I learn from those 3 :)
Current thread:
- google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Marty Strong via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Mike Hammett (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Alarig Le Lay (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Baldur Norddahl (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Jeff Waddell (Mar 02)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Howard Leadmon (Mar 02)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Niels Bakker (Mar 03)
- Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- RE: google ipv6 routes via cogent Aaron Gould (Mar 02)