nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering question
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:41:17 -0400
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:12 PM, craig washington < craigwashington01 () hotmail com> wrote:
Hello, Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from an ISP point of view.
You didn't say what kind of 'peering'. That could mean over an IXP or to be directly connected. You do not need to be a member of an IX to peer. There are at least three types of criteria to evaluate. Technical, business and legal. Take a look here for a few ideas on technical and business criteria: http://bit.ly/2ue2t0P "Me too" with the rest of the thread. If peering serves your mutual interests (or just yours even), its an easy decision. The Dr Peering http://drpeering.net/ website is also a resource for folks new to peering. http://drpeering.net/ Best Regards, -M<
Current thread:
- Re: BGP peering question, (continued)
- Re: BGP peering question Wolfgang Tremmel (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question David Hofstee (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question Bob Evans (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Ethan E. Dee (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question William Herrin (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question craig washington (Jul 14)
- Re: BGP peering question Owen DeLong (Jul 13)
- Re: BGP peering question H I Baysal (Jul 14)