Re: Bandwidth Savings

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

Peering is great when you can get to the IX inexpensively. I assume that glass that goes underwater has a significant 
increase in cost and therefore the cost savings of peering would be minuscule in comparison to the cost of the rest of 
the connectivity. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Richard Hicks" <richard.hicks () gmail com> 
To: "Keenan Singh" <keenansingh () airlinktt net> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 2:55:05 PM 
Subject: Re: Bandwidth Savings 

 
I don't know the the Caribbean Internet Exchanges market. Are any worth 
peering at versus buying additional L2 bandwidth to Miami? 

https://cw.ams-ix.net/ 
http://www.ocix.net/ocix/ 

Rick 

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Keenan Singh <keenansingh () airlinktt net> 
wrote: 

> Hi Guys 
>
> We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high Bandwidth 
> costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching however 
> with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be less and 
> less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on 
> Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have. We 
> do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there 
> are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort 
> of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I 
> have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what 
> results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic? 
>
> If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want we 
> currently. 
>
> Many thanks for any Help 
>
> Keenan