nanog mailing list archives
Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:11:46 -0500
On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:04 PM, Vincent Bernat <bernat () luffy cx> wrote:
❦ 23 février 2017 21:16 -0500, "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net> :A couple things will make this slightly less useful for the attacker: 1) How many people are not going to keep a copy? Once both docs are be found to have the same hash, well, game over.But if a transaction is automated, it may be too late. For example, if the document is a bank transfer slip.
If I can control the bank side of presenting an automated transfer slip, I really don’t need to worry about SHA-1 collisions. I already have all your money. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble, (continued)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 25)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jon Lewis (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Vincent Bernat (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Vincent Bernat (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Ricky Beam (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble valdis . kletnieks (Feb 23)
- RE: SHA1 collisions proven possisble David Edelman (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Lyndon Nerenberg (Feb 23)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Florian Weimer (Feb 24)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Jimmy Hess (Feb 25)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Nick Hilliard (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Brett Frankenberger (Feb 26)
- Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble Matt Palmer (Feb 26)