nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon () orthanc ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 18:15:45 -0800
On Dec 28, 2017, at 6:11 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote: All I was trying to say is there're going to be things not thought of yet that will chew up address space faster than ever before now that everyone believes it's essentially inexhaustible. And, I expect, sooner than imagined.
If that's the case, it will be because there were few restrictions placed upon that address space. And if some genius comes up with something that burns through all the IPv6 address space, you can rest assured the market (and not the IETF) will come up with a replacement that extends things beyond 128 bits in a ripping big hurry.
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Scott Weeks (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Baldur Norddahl (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brian Kantor (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Baldur Norddahl (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Michael Crapse (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 29)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 29)