nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:58:58 -0500
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone () gmail com> wrote:
M&A plays into this too. By my calculations, CenturyLink controls at least 17 million /48s. How many sites does CenturyLink provide service to? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's not 17 million.
there are less than 17m households served by centurylink's residential product? really? each of those could be considered a site and then get a /48. Oh: http://news.centurylink.com/CenturyLink-Reports-First-Quarter-2016-Results says in 2016 ~6.1m households.
Current thread:
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too, (continued)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mel Beckman (Dec 20)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Keith Medcalf (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too William Herrin (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jason Iannone (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too ops . lists (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Christopher Morrow (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jima (Dec 22)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Jimmy Hess (Dec 21)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Joe Maimon (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too George Metz (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Joe Maimon (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Harald Koch (Dec 20)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Aaron Gould (Dec 20)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Saku Ytti (Dec 20)
- RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too Aaron Gould (Dec 21)