RE: UPnP/IPv6 support in home routers?

["Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>]

UPnP is the spawn of Beelzebub.

Implementation by Bugs Bunny's maroons for use by other maroons is ok, I suppose, as long as those of us who are not 
maroons can turn the evil off.

However, if those maroons start whining about all the crap that happened to them because they enabled UPnP they better 
to be able to take the "I told you so you stupid maroon" in stride as a perfectly adequate and entirely correct 
statement of fact.

---
The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Fernando
> Gont
> Sent: Monday, 11 December, 2017 05:23
> To: NANOG
> Subject: UPnP/IPv6 support in home routers?
>
> Folks,
>
> Anyone can comment on the UPnP support for IPv6 in home routers?
>
> Those that I have checked have UPnP support for IPv4, but not for
> IPv6
> -- even when the home router does otherwise support IPv6.
>
> Looking at UPnP itself, it seems to allow opening holes at the IGD,
> but
> on a fully-specified (local ip, local port, remote ip, remote port)
> basis, which kind of sucks -- as one would want to be able to
> whitelist
> all ports for a given IP address, or at least (local ip, local port).
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont () si6networks com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492