Re: Suggestions for a more privacy conscious email provider

[Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

On 12/04/2017 02:24 PM, John Levine wrote:
> From your point of view, it's a linux box you can ssh into and manage 
> the same way you'd manage linux on a small physical machine.
In my naive opinion, there are some subtle differences with where "the 
linux box you can ssh into" resides.

Namely, when I ran my server at home, it took a search warrant to 
legally enter my house to access the server, which I would be 
immediately made aware of.  I can't say the same with the same degree of 
certainty for a server located in a co-location facility.

I'm obviously ignoring someone compromising the system across the 
network.  Though even then, I can disconnect the server from the outside 
world and still access it from my home.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature