nanog mailing list archives

Re: CGNAT


From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 20:03:54 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:

BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
load of CGNAT?

Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se


Current thread: